167:13, INVALID

From: Jeremy D. Selengut (selengut_at_nih.gov)
Date: Wed Aug 22 2001 - 10:47:32 PDT


>Begin
>
>geneticists cannot randomly modify genes and expect good results.
>Therefore only "the patented portion of a rule" may be altered in a
>subsequent rule.
>end

Submitted by Kitt Bartlett

Judgement: INVALID.  167:3, for instance, is considerably altered from
167:1, which has no patented portion.

Style: nice idea, but fatally vague.  +0.5.

-TWJ

--
Rule Date: 2001-08-22 17:49:17 GMT


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST