Yet another rule

From: Jesse F. W (jessefw_at_loop.com)
Date: Thu Aug 23 2001 - 09:25:00 PDT

• Next message: Christopher Bartlett: "Re: 167:17, VALID, +2.0"
• Previous message: Jeremy D. Selengut: "167:17, VALID, +2.0"
• Next in thread: Jeremy D. Selengut: "167:18, INVALID, -2.0"
• Reply: Jeremy D. Selengut: "167:18, INVALID, -2.0"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

begin rule:
Parent 167:14
"Our overworked Judge will" make us obey rules.  This can't be
taken for nothing.  It is a parasitic rule: A rule-writer must carefully
pick the words in their rule, ignoring patented parts, since he must
put in the genetic infomation of my rule, in the same order, in his
rules.
end rule.
submitted by Jesse W

--
Rule Date: 2001-08-23 16:27:40 GMT

• Next message: Christopher Bartlett: "Re: 167:17, VALID, +2.0"
• Previous message: Jeremy D. Selengut: "167:17, VALID, +2.0"
• Next in thread: Jeremy D. Selengut: "167:18, INVALID, -2.0"
• Reply: Jeremy D. Selengut: "167:18, INVALID, -2.0"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST