Re: 176:9 INVALID, -1.0

From: Stephen Turner (sret1_at_ntlworld.com)
Date: Thu Feb 07 2002 - 14:18:11 PST

Next message: Stephen Turner: "Round 176 over"
Previous message: Anton Cox: "Re: 176:9 INVALID, -1.0"
In reply to: Anton Cox: "Re: 176:9 INVALID, -1.0"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Anyway, it's moot, seeing as Factitious agreed with my ruling, and Alan's
rule was invalid for another reason!

Rich has just over 4 hours left to post a rule, or the round will be over.

--
Stephen Turner, Cambridge, UK    http://homepage.ntlworld.com/adelie/stephen/
"This is Henman's 8th Wimbledon, and he's only lost 7 matches." BBC, 2/Jul/01

--
Rule Date: 2002-02-07 22:18:23 GMT

Next message: Stephen Turner: "Round 176 over"
Previous message: Anton Cox: "Re: 176:9 INVALID, -1.0"
In reply to: Anton Cox: "Re: 176:9 INVALID, -1.0"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST