From: Richard S. Holmes (rsholmes_at_MailBox.Syr.Edu)
Date: Sun Mar 31 2002 - 04:59:09 PST
Aron Wall <aron_at_wall.org> writes: > 0 - cute to have self-reference, but you should have thought about the > other rules with the word redefined and what the effects would be, I did, and rule 180; 2 becomes A rule containing the word Splitsplotsplinksplonk shall never have its description [The bracketed one] after it. If the judge will kindly explain how he's trouble making sense of the above, I can perhaps clarify. I contend it does make sense; that it is consistent with all previous rules; and that 180:4 ought to be rejudged VALID. But I will withhold a proposal to that effect until the Judge clarifies his ruling, in case I'm missing something. -- - Rich Holmes Syracuse, NY -- Rule Date: 2002-03-31 12:59:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST