From: Richard S. Holmes (rsholmes_at_MailBox.Syr.Edu)
Date: Thu May 30 2002 - 11:18:06 PDT
James Willson <jkvw3_at_yahoo.com> writes: > 185:6 > >>>>>>>>>> > > Since the judge is an unsufferable twit,we will tell the judge what rules he > does and does not like. > > The judge likes all rules which are consistent with previous valid rules > which are not 185:5, but which are not consistent with 185:5. > > The judge does not like any other rule. > >>>>>>>>>> JUDGEMENT: No problems. Given the invalidity of 185:5, the question of whether the Judge likes a rule or not has no specific effect on play, so the constraint is legal but moot. STYLE: Well... barely on theme, and no restriction on future rules. But at least it's concise. +1.0. -- - Rich Holmes Syracuse, NY -- Rule Date: 2002-05-30 18:18:24 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST