From: Jeff Weston (Sir Toby) (jjweston_at_kenny.sir-toby.com)
Date: Mon Nov 11 2002 - 23:58:39 PST
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Tieka wrote: > Remember the Hypocrisy round? "Yes, Sincerity shall be our theme..." > > Each future eulogy shall say something nice about a previous eulogy. > > 196:4 would have been better if it hadn't duplicated 196:2's > requirement. > > > -- > Ed Murphy <emurphy42_at_socal.rr.com> "I'm not sure I can go through > http://members.fortunecity.com/emurphy/ with it. Leave, I mean." > > -- > Rule Date: 2002-11-10 22:25:18 GMT > ------------------- > > We seem to be losing the eulogy theme but with each rule getting > shorter, I suppose it is necessary for the theme to get smaller as well. > In fact, I can't seem to find any hint of eulogy except for the word > 'remember.' Because of this I must find this rule invalid but since it > does follow _most_ of the suggestions I will give it +2.0. > > Tieka, > who is looking for writing extolling the virtues and services of FRC. Still new here, so same disclaimer as before... Shouldn't this rule be valid? I believe it follows all of the requirements set forth in all previous rules. The regular ordinances don't specify a lack of following the theme as grounds for declaring a rule invalid. Although I'm perhaps referencing an out of date copy of the regular ordinances. Does the following URL have the current regular ordinances? http://www.win.tue.nl/~engels/frc/regular.txt -- Jeff Weston (Sir Toby) -- Rule Date: 2002-11-12 08:05:17 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST