Re: Proposal 196:F (As in final.)

From: Steve Gardner (gardner_at_sng.its.monash.edu.au)
Date: Thu Nov 14 2002 - 19:19:39 PST

• Next message: Ed Murphy: "Votes"
• Previous message: Glenn & Chrystal Overby: "196:F vote"
• In reply to: Mylton ne Blake: "Proposal 196:F (As in final.)"
• Next in thread: Alan Riddell: "Re: Proposal 196:F (As in final.)"
• Reply: Alan Riddell: "Re: Proposal 196:F (As in final.)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Mylton ne Blake wrote:

> Proposal 196:F
> Upon adoption of this proposal all previous proposals are
> awarded a pat on the back and then summarily rejected.  All
> previous rules are rendered invalid and the rounds is declared
> over,  Joshua - previously declared G.O.D. (D.O.G. aussi) of this
> fascinating rules committee in Round 192, becomes judge of
> round 197, and  Nathan Russel is awarded two style points for
> being so enthusiastic.
>
> "AS G.O.D. (or D.O.G.) I DON'T  HAVE TO SUBMIT A PROPOSAL
> TO GET WHAT I WANT BUT TO TRY AN REINFORCE THE
> LEGITIMACY OF THIS SHAKEN AND BATTERED COMMITTEE I
> WILL GO THROUGH THE PROPER  CHANNELS. (JUST KEEP THAT
> IN MIND WHEN AND IF YOU VOTE ON THIS PROPOSAL YOU
> PATHETIC MORTALS!)"
>
> I VOTE FOR THIS PROPOSAL.

I vote AGAINST this Proposal.

--


Steve Gardner                     |  Each writer creates their own
School of Computer Science        |  precursors.
 and Software Engineering         |
gardner_at_sng.its.monash.edu.au     |           -- Jorge Luis Borges

--
Rule Date: 2002-11-15 03:22:26 GMT

• Next message: Ed Murphy: "Votes"
• Previous message: Glenn & Chrystal Overby: "196:F vote"
• In reply to: Mylton ne Blake: "Proposal 196:F (As in final.)"
• Next in thread: Alan Riddell: "Re: Proposal 196:F (As in final.)"
• Reply: Alan Riddell: "Re: Proposal 196:F (As in final.)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST