From: Nathan Russell (nrussell_at_acsu.buffalo.edu)
Date: Mon Nov 25 2002 - 10:27:14 PST
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:24:43 -0500, you wrote: >> Doesn't propose a new rule. > >This rule's requirement was meant to be implicit: that each box contain >further boxes, each with a longer name than the last. > VALID +2, sorry. I don't know HOW I keep getting so confused. Should I start just giving "preliminary rulings", and wait in case I missed soemthing really obvious? Nathan -- Rule Date: 2002-11-25 18:27:04 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST