Re: Spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam... (fwd)

From: Richard S. Holmes (rsholmes_at_MailBox.Syr.Edu)
Date: Wed Apr 16 2003 - 14:50:24 PDT 

rsholmes_at_mailbox.syr.edu (Richard S. Holmes) writes:

> I think only one
> uncontrolled mention in the Google database is a pretty good indicator
> that leakage of a new address would be slow.

Unless of course there are viruses out there that harvest people's
address books and send them on to spammers.

Which I suppose there probably are.  I can't think of any reason why
someone wouldn't have done that by now.

In which case it'd leak almost instantaneously, I bet.

-- 
- Rich Holmes
  Syracuse, NY
                  "We're waist deep in the Big Muddy
                   And the big fool says to push on." -- Pete Seeger

-- 
Rule Date: 2003-04-16 21:50:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST