Re: Proposal 207:B

From: Ed Murphy (emurphy42_at_socal.rr.com)
Date: Wed May 07 2003 - 13:34:52 PDT

• Next message: Matthew Schuler: "207:1"
• Previous message: Jesse Welton: "Re: Proposal 207:B"
• In reply to: Richard S. Holmes: "Re: Proposal 207:B"
• Next in thread: Joshua: "208:1"
• Reply: Joshua: "208:1"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Richard Holmes wrote:

>Since Proposal 207:B merely attempts to enact by override what has in
>fact already occurred (and gets it slightly though inconsequentially
>wrong), I vote AGAINST it, and recommend we simply get on with Round
>208, with Ed as Judge and Steve as Wizard.

Fine by me.  The theme of Round 208 is "The FRC Reloaded".  Go!

-- 
Rule Date: 2003-05-07 20:37:25 GMT

• Next message: Matthew Schuler: "207:1"
• Previous message: Jesse Welton: "Re: Proposal 207:B"
• In reply to: Richard S. Holmes: "Re: Proposal 207:B"
• Next in thread: Joshua: "208:1"
• Reply: Joshua: "208:1"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST