Re: FRC round 223 call to order

From: Chuck Carroll (frc_at_chuckcarroll.org)
Date: Tue Apr 20 2004 - 06:45:07 PDT

• Next message: david nicol: "Re: FRC round 223 call to order"
• Previous message: david nicol: "FRC round 223 call to order"
• In reply to: david nicol: "FRC round 223 call to order"
• Next in thread: david nicol: "Re: FRC round 223 call to order"
• Reply: david nicol: "Re: FRC round 223 call to order"
• Reply: Karl Low: "Re: FRC round 223 call to order"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

At 01:03 AM 4/17/04 +0200, david nicol wrote:
>All valid rules must allow for continuation of play.

Did we change the R.O.s?  I don't believe the judge has the authority to declare this by fiat.

Chuck

• Next message: david nicol: "Re: FRC round 223 call to order"
• Previous message: david nicol: "FRC round 223 call to order"
• In reply to: david nicol: "FRC round 223 call to order"
• Next in thread: david nicol: "Re: FRC round 223 call to order"
• Reply: david nicol: "Re: FRC round 223 call to order"
• Reply: Karl Low: "Re: FRC round 223 call to order"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST