From: jcm3_at_cec.wustl.edu
Date: Wed May 19 2004 - 11:14:29 PDT
224:3 VALID +2.5 Although others have claimed ignorance before, I see ignorance as the absence of opinion, and therefore does not conflict with the opinions of others. Without the ability to "second" a rule, I will judge all future "rule contents" as "ineffective," yet judge that "rules" will still be used to determine "validity." This is not too far from reality anyway =). Style: +1 On theme +1 Makes my life easier +0.5 Claims ignorance, and acts on that ignorance to squeltch the "effective yet invalid" 224:1 > I'm ignorant of previous rules. > The hive doesn't second rules, that implies individuality > in that they > might not be seconded. We act with one mind and one voice. > This much is > obvious. As such, no future rule, including this one, may > be seconded. > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST