Re: rule 231:2 (VALID, +2.0 style)

From: Ed Murphy (emurphy42_at_socal.rr.com)
Date: Thu Jan 20 2005 - 15:26:02 PST

Next message: Ed Murphy: "Re: rule 231:3 (VALID, +3.0 style)"
Previous message: Ed Murphy: "Re: rule 231:1 (VALID, +1.0 style)"
In reply to: David Nicol: "Re: rule 231:2"
Next in thread: Ed Murphy: "Re: rule 231:1 (VALID, +1.0 style)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 12:45, David Nicol wrote:

> I participated in the founding of the FRC back in the day, and thus am
> of degree four.  To have a higher degree than four, in my opinion, takes
> super-powers of some kind.  The degree system is very new and all aspects 
> of it are  subject to change at this time.

No problems.  VALID, +2.0 style (bonus for following the
not-really-a-restriction in 231:1).

Next message: Ed Murphy: "Re: rule 231:3 (VALID, +3.0 style)"
Previous message: Ed Murphy: "Re: rule 231:1 (VALID, +1.0 style)"
In reply to: David Nicol: "Re: rule 231:2"
Next in thread: Ed Murphy: "Re: rule 231:1 (VALID, +1.0 style)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST